The principle of “net neutrality” holds that no one company or group of organizations should have control over the internet. Because of this regulation, businesses won’t be able to ban consumers’ access to specific websites while at the same time charging them for access to other websites. Those who advocate for this policy think that everyone should have equal access to the internet and that it should not be restricted in any way. Additionally, President Obama has advocated for the regulation of telecommunications corporations more similarly to that of utilities, rather than as monopolies. It is important to have a thorough understanding of both the benefits and drawbacks of the concept of net neutrality before making a decision on whether or not to support it.

Internet service providers and the concept of “net neutrality” are two very distinct topics, yet they do have certain points in common. The principle behind the concept of “net neutrality” is that users should be able to use the internet free from bias or obstruction. ISPs may be compared to common carriers in several ways. They are required to have a license and may not engage in discrimination. This implies that they are prohibited from obstructing content or refusing service to any person unless they can provide convincing evidence for doing so. Because of this, several supporters of the principle of net neutrality have advocated for internet service providers (ISPs) to be regulated as if they were common carriers. However, the United States Supreme Court has ruled that this technique cannot be used.

In the meanwhile, in 2015 the Federal Communications Commission of the United States established a regulation that compels internet service providers to provide the same download speeds and access to all websites, regardless of the material found on such websites. The goal of this law is to maintain control over internet service providers (ISPs) and guarantee that all customers get the same level of service, including high download speeds.

The Internet is regarded as a public utility in accordance with the Title II Communications Act of the United States federal government. As a result of this, Internet service providers are required to adhere to a set of guidelines in order to preserve the accessibility of the Internet. Because they lack these standards, they are unable to discriminate in any way, including charging higher rates or limiting access to certain websites. At this time, video streaming services use up 57% of the bandwidth available around the globe.

In addition to safeguarding the legal rights of end users, the maintenance of network neutrality paves the way for the creation of new business prospects. This may help businesses develop their product portfolios and increase revenue by encouraging healthy competition among Internet service providers (ISPs). In addition to this, network neutrality makes wireless devices more appealing to users, which in turn enhances the value of these gadgets. However, it is essential to emphasize that network neutrality does not preclude Internet service providers (ISPs) from earning revenue from their services.

The Internet Freedom Act (IFA) makes it illegal to engage in network management activities that are in any way discriminatory against users. For instance, the legislation forbids paid prioritizing and zero-rating, both of which are instances of activities that are considered to be unjust. In addition, the bill does not place any limitations on the use of pricing that is application-specific. Additionally, the usage of purchased bandwidth for certain apps such as Netflix is not prohibited by this provision.

The principle of “net neutrality” is essential to the operation of an open internet. If it is not in place, internet service providers have the ability to discriminate against specific websites and limit the material that consumers see. While there are many who believe this is an unjust practice, there are others who reject it on the grounds that it violates their libertarian ideals. Because of this, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) has been considering the possibility of pulling back the restrictions on net neutrality ever since 2017. With this change, internet service providers would be able to charge businesses for speeding up their own services or ban access to websites.
Consumers