The term “net neutrality” refers to the principle that users should have unrestricted access to the internet. The end of regulations mandating that internet service providers must treat all data sent over their networks as equal would have a chilling impact on users’ ability to express themselves freely online and would make it more difficult for customers to get the material they want. Each side of the argument has their own unique set of priorities when it comes to preserving the principle of net neutrality.
Consumers, according to those who advocate for net neutrality, would have a more difficult time obtaining material online.

The historical achievements of the Internet, which were accomplished without the oversight of the government, are cited by those who are opposed to the principle of network neutrality. On the other hand, supporters of deregulatory policies for the internet contend that these policies will boost innovation and competition. They point out that Internet service providers are required to make investments in their networks in order to keep them operational, but the laws would prohibit them from doing so. Despite the fact that they utilize the networks in higher numbers, heavy users do not make any financial contribution toward the cost of improving the infrastructure.

Those who are in favor of maintaining net neutrality refer to the psychological process of adaption. If customers had no choice but to utilize a sluggish Internet service, the experience would be terrible for them. Internet service providers that do not provide a “fast lane” would be put at a disadvantage in the market as a result of this development.

Opponents of net neutrality argue that the proposed change would hinder innovation and make it more difficult for smaller enterprises to enter the market. If Internet service providers would not have to compete against one another, they may prefer some websites over others, which would slow down the development of new businesses. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) now forbids Internet service providers (ISPs) from censoring legally accessible material and prohibiting consumers from connecting to the device of their choice.

Opponents of net neutrality refer to the fact that the regulations aren’t clear and that the rules would raise the cost of consumer content as evidence to support their position. Even while telecommunications providers have pledged to keep the internet free and available to all users, there is no assurance that the regulations will be adhered to. In addition, the FCC has put an excessive amount of faith in these private businesses operating for their own profit. ISPs would be required to offer more information on their traffic management practices under the proposed new guidelines, for one. In addition, the Federal Trade Commission as well as state attorneys general would have the ability to take legal action against businesses that break the guidelines.